Well according to the old joke, turning the other cheek gets you slapped on both cheeks. But there’s a serious principle to consider here and one that is often mentioned within Christian circles – the idea of giving up more, sacrificing more than we might reasonably be expected to.
Jesus is known for exhortations to turn the other cheek, or to give more than we are asked for, to make donations or gifts to those in need rather than to make loans. In a time when a person could be forced by a Roman soldier to carry his pack for a mile, Jesus said “Go two”.
The best things in blogs often happen in the comments and in a recent post we got some great comments. In particular, the questions was asked – what do I think of the idea of turning the other cheek in the real world? Does it work? How? What do we have to give up and what do we gain by doing that?
To be fair, this may not be the actual intended question, but it is how I’ve understood it and I’ve found it a very interesting thing to consider.
I’ve thought about this for a couple of days and the truth is that I’m not sure of an absolute answer. The specific example mentioned in the question was if a Christian nation was bombed into non-existence, would this act of turning the other cheek have a significant impact?
It all stemmed from asking what the disconnect may be between what is best for the nation and what is desirable for the person of faith? Fundementally (as almost always), I think this all depends on how we understand such things.
For example, I personally tend to find faith to be an intensely private and intimate thing. I may share conversations of faith, thoughts of faith and the practise of faith with others, but ultimately my faith is very much personal and indeed the only way I can understand faith as having any intrinsic meaning is in that intimacy. Which isn’t to say that faith doesn’t have value in other expressions or arenas, but that (to my way of thinking at least) the meaning, that deeper layer of richness, is personal.
But the nation (any nation, it doesn’t matter which one) is by its very nature a large, robust and rambunctious thing full of competing ideas, ideals and personal convictions. Different faiths and no faiths at all, can all co-exist within a nation. So can a nation ever really turn its cheek? I think it’s possible, but highly unlikely. I think that the pacifistic Indian protests against British colonial occupation, as led by Gandhi, are probably the closest we’ve seen to a nation turning the other cheek and even then I don’t think it was an entire nation.
See a nation is bound, required to look for an upside to turning the other cheek. In order to best represent (or attempt to represent) the needs of the people a nation must first ask what are the needs of the people. This is why nations exist. So before a nation can begin to seriously consider whether or not to turn the other cheek it must identify the possibility of gaining something of suitable value in return for such a sacrifice.
I believe that Jesus was asking his followers to do a far more difficult, radical and dangerous thing. I think he was asking his followers to not think of the next mile or the other cheek or the money given away. I think he was asking his followers to think of the other people with whom they interacted. I believe that Jesus was asking his followers to live out a deeply personal and meaningful faith in deeply personal and meaningful ways.
The notion of sacrifice is a powerful and (if we’re honest) terrifying one. The thing is that in order for a sacrifice to be real and meaningful, it has to hurt. It has to cost. Otherwise it’s not really a sacrifice. So maybe you need to sacrifice a little bit of pride and turn the other cheek. Maybe you need to sacrifice some wealth and just give a week’s pay to someone in need. Maybe you need to sacrifice some time and energy to lift someone else’s burden and carry it a couple of miles for them. The truth is that it’s HARD to willingly give up our comforts and ease, but that’s what makes those sacrificial gifts so important.
There are some really interesting ideas that come up when you start to talk about sacrificial living. Traditionally all sacrifices are offered up (quite literally made into offerings) to God. So when Jesus asks us to sacrifice for his sake, to turn the other cheek, to give to those in need, to help the sick, to visit those in prison, then isn’t he asking us to offer these sacrificial acts up to God? Isn’t then, the true and pure motivation to make the best offering we can to God?
In Romans 12, we’re exhorted to offering ourselves up as living sacrifices. Does this mean that we’re to do our best to make as many of our actions as we can sacrificial? Did Jesus make it even more clear in the parable of the sheep and the goats (truly the most terrifying passage in the Bible)? “As much as you have done it to the least of these, my brethren, you have done it to me.”
So for me, the simple fact is that I don’t believe that I can live in a Christian nation, unless I can first live as a Christian. Not with a set of rules to follow and a checklist of things to do. But with a pure and giving heart, willing to sacrifice whenever I need to, in order to honour God. If I can ever muster the courage and strength to do that properly, well then that would really be something.
Turning the other cheek may never get me anything more than slapped on both cheeks, but I want to be brave enough and strong enough to be able to turn it anyway.
I hope we see each other in the second mile.
What you said…